Case law

CJEU ruling Scania C-251/22 P: the impact on compensation

By definitively dismissing the Swedish manufacturer’s appeal, the Court of Justice locked in proof of the infringement and reset limitation periods across the Union.

1 Feb 2024
Date of the final ruling
EUR 880m
Fine upheld
8
Years of litigation
2028-2029
Window for action

A timeline that works in hauliers favour

During the 2016 negotiations led by the European Commission, Scania refused to admit its part in the collusion on gross list prices and the delayed Euro 3 to Euro 6 emission technology. The Commission therefore severed its case and issued an individual decision on 27 September 2017.

The manufacturer brought an action for annulment before the General Court of the European Union in case T-799/17, then appealed to the Court of Justice. By its irrevocable ruling of 1 February 2024, the Court dismissed every ground raised.

That decision definitively confirms Scania’s continuous participation in the cartel from 1997 to 2011, the validity of the evidence of collusion, and the legal obligation to make good the harm caused to all buyers and lessees of vehicles over 6 tonnes.

Date

Stage of the procedure

2016

Refusal to settle during the European global agreement

27 September 2017

Individual fine of EUR 880 million

2022

Action dismissed by the General Court, case T-799/17

1 February 2024

Final CJEU ruling, case C-251/22 P

2024 to 2029

Window for action open to victims

How national courts apply the ruling

In France, article L. 481-1 of the Commercial Code makes compensation claims relating to Scania trucks, and by extension to the other brands in the cartel, fully admissible until 2028-2029. In the Netherlands the courts confirm the absolute suspensive effect of the appeal on all collective actions. In Germany, section 33h GWB secures the admissibility of fleet files until 2028.

See the Scania manufacturer file for eligible models, and our country-by-country comparison of deadlines.

How your claim is calculated

The original overcharge is only part of your claim. The decisive lever is the compounding of statutory late payment interest, accrued over twelve to twenty-eight years.

C = (Vb × α) × (1 + r)t
  • C: total claimable compensation, principal and late payment interest combined
  • Vb: gross list price or net acquisition value of the vehicle
  • α: artificial overcharge applied by the cartel, between 10 and 20 %
  • r: average statutory annual interest rate applied by the court, 3 to 5 %
  • t: number of years elapsed since the original invoice was paid

Worked example: for a Scania R420 Topline bought new in 2006 at EUR 115,000 net, the 15 % overcharge is EUR 17,250. With twenty years of interest at 4 % per year, the total claim reaches roughly EUR 37,775 for that single vehicle.

01

Eligibility check

Send us your invoices, lease agreements, registration documents or asset registers covering 1997 to 2014.

02

Audit and firm offer

Our lawyers and econometricians quantify your claim within four weeks.

03

Guided decision

You choose between a cash purchase of your claim within 30 days and litigation on a success-fee basis.

04

Payment released

The compensation is credited directly to your company bank account.

Frequently asked questions

It definitively confirms Scania’s liability and its EUR 880 million fine, which locks in proof of the infringement and extends the limitation period to 2028-2029.

Following the irrevocable dismissal of the appeal in 2024, court actions and claim assignments remain fully admissible before the European courts until 2028-2029.

Yes. Standing belongs to the business that bore the initial financial burden of the overcharge, whether the vehicle was financed on hire purchase, long-term hire or has since been sold.

Because it lengthens the life of the file: the compounding formula applies over a longer period, which increases the late payment interest owed.

The other files in the expertise centre

All the analyses in this section, plus the Legal expertise hub for the overview.

Assert your rights after the Scania ruling

The legal footing has never been stronger. Hand the analysis of your fleet to our experts.

Or write directly to contact@truckcartelclaim.com